Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 12 Jul 2006 16:50:09 +0200 (CEST)
From:      <pfgshield-freebsd@yahoo.com>
To:        Mike Meyer <mwm@mired.org>
Cc:        mag@intron.ac, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: kern/99979: Get Ready for Kernel Module in C++
Message-ID:  <20060712145009.79159.qmail@web32701.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <17589.1784.567790.215719@bhuda.mired.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--- Mike Meyer <mwm@mired.org> ha scritto: 
...
> 
> Windows is the de-facto standard OS: a lot of people know how to use
> it.
> 

Well... I wish several commercial CAD software producers thought otherwise. 

> We're bright enough to know that popularity doesn't imply technical
> excellence, otherwise we wouldn't be on a FreeBSD list. Having avoided
> that trap in the choice of platform, doesn't it behoove us to avoid it
> elswhere?
> 

Is someone still using SPIN/modula?? ;-).

If it were easy to replace C++ with C + kobj() than I'd say... leave things as
they are. But if it's not difficult to make some C++ modules work than we
should be bright enough to evaluate the changes.

I don't have any real opinion of the patches though, so I'll leave the matter
here.

cheers,

    Pedro.

Chiacchiera con i tuoi amici in tempo reale! 
 http://it.yahoo.com/mail_it/foot/*http://it.messenger.yahoo.com 



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060712145009.79159.qmail>