Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 23:14:44 +0100 From: Divacky Roman <xdivac02@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> To: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> Cc: Roman Divacky <rdivacky@freebsd.org>, Perforce Change Reviews <perforce@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: PERFORCE change 112893 for review Message-ID: <20070116221444.GA10264@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> In-Reply-To: <200701161552.36888.jhb@freebsd.org> References: <200701141353.l0EDr4Bn085459@repoman.freebsd.org> <200701161552.36888.jhb@freebsd.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 03:52:36PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote: > On Sunday 14 January 2007 08:53, Roman Divacky wrote: > > http://perforce.freebsd.org/chv.cgi?CH=112893 > > > > Change 112893 by rdivacky@rdivacky_witten on 2007/01/14 13:52:42 > > > > Make linux_vfork() actually work. This enables make to work again > > with 2.6 > > You should be using RFSTOPPED and starting the new process up after you set > P_PPWAIT before you block to avoid races. fork1() for vfork does exactly this... I just copied its behaviour. It also seems to me to be more correct but fork1() does it this way. can you look at it?home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070116221444.GA10264>