Date: Tue, 11 Nov 1997 08:57:29 -0700 From: Eddie Fry <eddie@eaznet.com> To: Steve Hovey <shovey@buffnet.net> Cc: "Bryn Wm. Moslow" <bryn@nwlink.com>, freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Adaptec problems? Message-ID: <34688069.96D1D97A@eaznet.com> References: <Pine.BSI.3.95.971110181345.952A-100000@buffnet11.buffnet.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I have a 2940UW running in a 2.2.2 box with a PP180 without problems. It was previously running 2.1.5 without problems also. But, I am not using it for news. And I'm not using Tagged Command Queueing. I doubt if this helps much. But thought you might like to know. Eddie Steve Hovey wrote: > On Mon, 10 Nov 1997, Bryn Wm. Moslow wrote: > > > > > Hello, I'm wondering if anyone has seen this kind of thing. When I finally > > got logged on to the box (took about 5 minutes to get a shell login and > > about 5 min for commands to run) I found several (20 or so) instances of > > inetd running and >100 sendmail processes running with a load of 8+. The > > only consistent error seems to be with SCSI when I've seen this. I *am* > > using tagged command queuing (AHC_TAGENABLE) and may stop. I've included > > Ok - I have a 2.2.5 with regular 2940, and a 2.1.5 with 2940 Ultra - both > are news servers - The 2.2.5 with the 2940 seems ok - but the 2.1.5 with > the ultra locked up inn with the errors you mention and the file system > full message - also the drive its complaining about is unmountable, and I > cant issue an ls command or anything on it. > > So its either the driver, or that particular controller. Dunno which - I > know this is mostly useless info. -- Eddie Fry eddie@eaznet.com EAZNet Internet Services http://www.eaznet.com 220 West 7th Street Safford, AZ 85546 EAZing you into the future...
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?34688069.96D1D97A>