Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1998 19:03:20 -0500 (EST) From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@hotjobs.com> To: Nathan Dorfman <nathan@rtfm.net> Cc: "David E. Cross" <crossd@phoenix.cs.rpi.edu>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: O_SYNC Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9811091901470.22497-100000@porkfriedrice.ny.genx.net> In-Reply-To: <19981109185638.B8871@rtfm.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 9 Nov 1998, Nathan Dorfman wrote: > > > Is 'O_FSYNC" what you are looking for? > > > > > > #define O_FSYNC 0x0080 /* synchronous writes */ > > > > Yes, however every other OS defines it at "O_SYNC" why are we different? > > or, if there is a reason, why isn't there a compatibility #define? > > > > can someone check this on netbsd/open bsd/os ? is it bsd or us? > > NetBSD 1.3.2: > fcntl.h:92:#define O_SYNC 0x0080 /* synchronous writes */ > fcntl.h:127:#define FFSYNC O_SYNC /* kernel */ > fcntl.h:129:#define O_FSYNC O_SYNC /* compat */ > anyone want to commit this to make FreeBSD a bit more port-friendly? -Alfred To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.05.9811091901470.22497-100000>