Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 13:18:06 +0100 From: Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com> To: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> Cc: Garrett Cooper <yanegomi@gmail.com>, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>, Mike Meyer <mwm@mired.org>, Zhihao Yuan <lichray@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Providing a default graphical environment on FreeBSD Message-ID: <CADLo838%2B-OmUi9jFS4YZP8CZBnFN3%2BOKm%2B0ZTO71t9E8DGedsw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1209181039140.44948@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <74299.1347956133@critter.freebsd.dk> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1209181039140.44948@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 18 Sep 2012 09:41, "Wojciech Puchar" <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> wrote: >>> >>> desktop environment" or similar ideas? >> >> >> Tell you what: >> >> When you have at least 75% of the user population of FreeBSD agreeing >> on which window manager we should offer as the default, we can talk >> about this. > > > so if 76% would decide that FreeBSD should have KDE included in system - it means that it should? No. Read the thread properly. Chris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CADLo838%2B-OmUi9jFS4YZP8CZBnFN3%2BOKm%2B0ZTO71t9E8DGedsw>