Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 10 Mar 1998 02:11:22 -0500
From:      tcobb@staff.circle.net
To:        hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   UNION FS appropriate?
Message-ID:  <8188AD2EBC3CD111B7A30060082F32A40C3FA3@freya.circle.net>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

What is the current known state of UNION FS?

Here's my situation:

I have a set of directories which contain a user's files (mostly web
stuff).  FTP chroots nicely into this space, and I have other public
services which do so, too.  All of these files are served from a primary
NFS server.  What I'd like to do is mount these directories on a new
box, and then allow a chrooted telnet.  The telnet side I can handle
just fine, but I need to 'overlay' onto these directories such stock
binaries as chmod,ping,vi, etc.  This will allow me to let folks telnet
in, and have a usable experience, but not require separate copies of
these binaries in each chroot-space.  Is this possible with UNION?  Is
UNION stable enough to handle being dynamically mapped on login?  

If so, I can find very little information on how to *actually* use it.
Ultimately, I'll need to have several overlays of the same files into
separate directories for this purpose.

Pointers appreciated.

- Troy Cobb
Circle Net, Inc.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?8188AD2EBC3CD111B7A30060082F32A40C3FA3>