Date: Thu, 28 May 1998 13:17:23 -0700 From: Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au> To: Andrzej Bialecki <abial@nask.pl> Cc: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au>, Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com>, Nicholas Charles Brawn <ncb05@uow.edu.au>, Ollivier Robert <roberto@keltia.freenix.fr>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Linux emulation failure (was Star-office) Message-ID: <199805282017.NAA01468@dingo.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 28 May 1998 22:56:22 %2B0200." <Pine.NEB.3.95.980528225458.3847B-100000@korin.warman.org.pl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Thu, 28 May 1998, Daniel O'Connor wrote: > > > > try truss, as that gives better information under linux emulation I'm > > > told. > > OK, I'll give it a go > > I kinda remember from some linux talk that they started to use glibc in > the newest SO4.0 release instead of normal linux libc... This could be the > cause. Thanks for the confirmation; the bogon is about right for glibc's generally pretty poor standard. I wonder what the SCO people are doing, now that they have given up on a source-level compatibility and are chasing Linux binary compatibility. I guess I should do something with the ODT pile here. -- \\ Sometimes you're ahead, \\ Mike Smith \\ sometimes you're behind. \\ mike@smith.net.au \\ The race is long, and in the \\ msmith@freebsd.org \\ end it's only with yourself. \\ msmith@cdrom.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199805282017.NAA01468>