Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2017 04:58:43 +1100 From: andrew clarke <mail@ozzmosis.com> To: FreeBSD <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Cc: Carmel NY <carmel_ny@outlook.com> Subject: Re: Create list of ports to update Message-ID: <20171203175843.hdzbvm7fiebo2dhc@ozzmosis.com> In-Reply-To: <BN6PR2001MB17308EADD4DFC564D402D994803F0@BN6PR2001MB1730.namprd20.prod.outlook.com> References: <BN6PR2001MB17305559DF55EB2CF39C2959803F0@BN6PR2001MB1730.namprd20.prod.outlook.com> <8d5d17b8-a206-810a-b92e-a29d053dd8e3@hayers.org> <BN6PR2001MB17308EADD4DFC564D402D994803F0@BN6PR2001MB1730.namprd20.prod.outlook.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun 2017-12-03 17:03:49 UTC+0000, Carmel NY (carmel_ny@outlook.com) wrote: > On Sunday, December 3, 2017 11:44 AM, Gary J. Hayers stated: > > > > > > On 03/12/2017 16:40, Carmel NY wrote: > > > Reading up on "poudriere", it appears that I have to feed it a list of > > > ports that need to be updated. Unlike "synth" which can figure that > > > out by itself, it does seem counterproductive. > > > > > > My question, now that "portmaster" is apparently dead in the water, > > > what is the easiest way to construct a list of ports that need updating in > > > the: "port-category/port-name" format? > > > pkg query '%o' > ports.txt > > Doesn't that just list all of the installed ports, not just the ones that need updating? pkg query %o > /tmp/pkglist.txt poudriere -v bulk -j 11amd64 -f /tmp/pkglist.txt This is what I use. Poudriere will only build ports from the list that need updating. This includes rebuilding ports that have had updated dependencies, (which iirc is a change from Portmaster's behaviour, though seemingly you can turn this off with 'poudriere bulk -S').
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20171203175843.hdzbvm7fiebo2dhc>