Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2004 09:29:39 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> Cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] IPX and NWFS to be killed in -current. Message-ID: <20041206172939.GD32801@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <79850.1102328666@critter.freebsd.dk> References: <41B43140.802@freebsd.org> <79850.1102328666@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 11:24:26AM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> "Does anybody care about PR's against the code and does it even work ?"
>
> This last one I think we can answer:
>
> Hint:
>
> S Submitted Tracker Resp. Description
> f 2001/12/13 kern/32797 glebius [netgraph] Problem with IPX and netgraph(4)
> o 2003/03/06 kern/48976 nwfs.ko oddity
> a 2003/11/12 kern/59211 [nwfs] System crashes when moving files from NWFS mounted system
> p 2004/04/05 kern/65217 bms PATCH: Improve Linux IPX application compatibility
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=65217
State-Changed-From-To: open->patched
State-Changed-By: bms
State-Changed-When: Tue Jun 22 21:47:01 GMT 2004
State-Changed-Why:
Committed to -CURRENT, thanks!
Looks like a "YES" to me, there is at least one committer. The PR is
probably just in the wrong state now and should have been closed.
--
-- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041206172939.GD32801>