Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2015 13:51:26 -0800 From: Garrett Cooper <yaneurabeya@gmail.com> To: Bruce Evans <brde@optusnet.com.au> Cc: Bryan Drewery <bdrewery@freebsd.org>, Andrew Turner <andrew@fubar.geek.nz>, "Kenneth D. Merry" <ken@freebsd.org>, src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r291741 - head/sys/geom Message-ID: <FBCA137E-227E-407A-833D-584911EEE1FD@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20151205064802.B4095@besplex.bde.org> References: <201512040338.tB43cZY1053263@repo.freebsd.org> <56610B6B.8010708@FreeBSD.org> <20151204233052.J2220@besplex.bde.org> <20151204125355.6712d782@bender> <20151205031713.T3286@besplex.bde.org> <5661E52D.6050305@FreeBSD.org> <20151205064802.B4095@besplex.bde.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Dec 4, 2015, at 12:42, Bruce Evans <brde@optusnet.com.au> wrote: ... > I wouldn't trust style(9) for anything except simple formatting, but > look at the subsystem(s) style. Just the top level of geom has 11000+ > lines which can be considered as giving about 20 times more examples > than style(9). It would be nice if we had more explicit rules in style(9).. Subtle interpretation like this is best left for philosophical and religious texts. The amount of time spent on checking code style (both your's, which is appreciated, and others), because style(9) wasn't explicit in areas is time better spent on other things. </rant> -NGie
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?FBCA137E-227E-407A-833D-584911EEE1FD>