Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2023 23:03:28 +0100 From: Michael Gmelin <grembo@freebsd.org> To: Kurt Jaeger <pi@freebsd.org> Cc: User Ngor <ihor@antonovs.family>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Tooling Integration and Developer Experience Message-ID: <A6F1BBFB-BED5-4D90-BB31-E0056A8E45F8@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <Y9mLixADFf9ixXBg@home.opsec.eu> References: <Y9mLixADFf9ixXBg@home.opsec.eu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On 31. Jan 2023, at 22:44, Kurt Jaeger <pi@freebsd.org> wrote: >=20 > =EF=BB=BFHi! >=20 >>>> This can be as easy as moving everything into Phabricator. >>> There's the issue that Phabricator itself is no longer supported >>> upstream: > [...] >>> https://we.phorge.it/ >=20 >> Should be no harder than regular update. They even have a HOWTO >> https://we.phorge.it/w/installation_and_setup/update_from_phabricator/ >=20 > So, as a step 0 we would need a phorge port... >> 1. Upgrade to Phorge >> 2. Setup Maniphest for bugs and tasks >> 3. Migrate bugs into Maniphest >> 4. Enable Harbormaster (Build/CI) - this requires coordination with >> whoever is working on pre-commit CI. > [...] >> Infra operations are hard, and I have experience with it. I'd be happy to= >> help. >=20 > Do you think you can provide a phorge port ? >=20 I created the phabricator port in 2014 and have been maintaining it since th= en. I=E2=80=99m also subscribed to phorge, so technically I could also maint= ain a phorge port (I also have many years of experience in maintaining and u= sing phabricator instances, also fixing bugs and adding some local features)= . So far I haven=E2=80=99t created a port for phorge, as progress on it seemed= very slow (and many of the changes were also merged into phab) and therefor= e there was little incentive to migrate any of the instances I maintain. AFAIK FreeBSD=E2=80=99s phabricator instance is not based on the port and us= es custom patches anyway (I can=E2=80=99t remember having a single communica= tion with phabricator-admin regarding the port), therefore having a phorge p= ort most likely isn=E2=80=99t a pre-condition for the project to use it. Best=20 > --=20 > pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 Now what ? >=20
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?A6F1BBFB-BED5-4D90-BB31-E0056A8E45F8>