Date: 12 Mar 2002 11:06:25 -0800 From: swear@blarg.net (Gary W. Swearingen) To: Michael Lucas <mwlucas@blackhelicopters.org> Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: /etc/make.conf question Message-ID: <shk7sha9n2.7sh@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <20020312114158.A92910@blackhelicopters.org> References: <Pine.GSO.4.32.0203121126520.1546-100000@nippur.irb.hr> <20020312074349.A91204@blackhelicopters.org> <20020312155618.GA9463@raggedclown.net> <20020312114158.A92910@blackhelicopters.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Michael Lucas <mwlucas@blackhelicopters.org> writes: > Remember, the correct dance for an upgrade these days includes the following: > > make buildworld > make buildkernel > make installkernel > <reboot, single-user> > make installworld > mergemaster > <reboot> I replace the second two steps with "make kernel". I'd be glad to know any disadvantage of that not shared by the two-step. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?shk7sha9n2.7sh>