Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2010 12:21:07 +0200 From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no> To: Xin LI <delphij@gmail.com> Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: /stand/camcontrol Message-ID: <86vd6ola3w.fsf@ds4.des.no> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikYhZ0NbYs4XVgPcB12svxS=Hmgb70mzLv2SbPV@mail.gmail.com> (Xin LI's message of "Thu, 2 Sep 2010 03:14:47 -0700") References: <86bp8h5mn6.fsf@ds4.des.no> <AANLkTimbj2keVzpHC5CHP6buxg=RRu8FsWL4QK0g-K80@mail.gmail.com> <86d3swmpjz.fsf@ds4.des.no> <AANLkTikYhZ0NbYs4XVgPcB12svxS=Hmgb70mzLv2SbPV@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Xin LI <delphij@gmail.com> writes: > Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav <des@des.no> writes: > > Xin LI <delphij@gmail.com> writes: > > > My 2 cents: I think we don't really need to care about the size > > > for rescue binary after the splitfs VFS layer have been introduced > > > to libstand? Build of release split MFSROOT was 2006-ish and I > > > feel that this can be gone. > > This is /stand, not /rescue; /rescue has a full camcontrol. > Oh you are right. But MFSROOT have /stand (for sysinstall), not > /rescue, I think? Correct. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86vd6ola3w.fsf>