Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 14:41:20 +0100 From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> Cc: FreeBSD Current <current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: netstat wierdness? Message-ID: <86r6rt6z27.fsf@dwp.des.no> In-Reply-To: <45F45172.8070601@elischer.org> (Julian Elischer's message of "Sun, 11 Mar 2007 11:58:58 -0700") References: <45F388D4.2080900@elischer.org> <45F45172.8070601@elischer.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> writes: > answering myself.. > comes from having options LOCK_PROFILING in my kernel. > adding the same to /etc/make.conf and recompiling netstat and libkvm help= ed. > (not sure if both are needed) This is very bad. LOCK_PROFILING should have no visible effect on userland. That is precisely what xinpcb, xunpcb, xtcpcb etc. are for: to isolate userland from kernel structures. They should not contain any locks or anything else which would be affected by LOCK_PROFILING or other kernel options. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86r6rt6z27.fsf>