Date: Fri, 11 Apr 1997 09:07:48 +0200 From: phk@dk.tfs.com To: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: WHY? ...non-use of TAILQ macros... Message-ID: <1094.860742468@critter> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 10 Apr 1997 15:48:44 PDT." <199704102248.PAA10021@phaeton.artisoft.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <199704102248.PAA10021@phaeton.artisoft.com>, Terry Lambert writes: > >On the theory that the TAILQ_xxx macros were being avoided and the >queue elemments themselves directly refernce for No Good Reason(tm), >I just compiled the following: You're way behind Terry! :-) I argued this long time ago and started to introduce the _FIRST, _LAST, _NEXT, _PREV and _EMPTY macros as I have got to it. A patch for this from you would be most welcome of course. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | phk@FreeBSD.ORG FreeBSD Core-team. http://www.freebsd.org/~phk | phk@login.dknet.dk Private mailbox. whois: [PHK] | phk@tfs.com TRW Financial Systems, Inc. Power and ignorance is a disgusting cocktail.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1094.860742468>