Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2006 13:57:17 -0500 From: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> To: Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org> Cc: Perforce Change Reviews <perforce@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: PERFORCE change 91195 for review Message-ID: <200602061357.18485.jhb@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <200602052322.k15NMgBs082593@repoman.freebsd.org> References: <200602052322.k15NMgBs082593@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sunday 05 February 2006 18:22, Robert Watson wrote: > http://perforce.freebsd.org/chv.cgi?CH=91195 > > Change 91195 by rwatson@rwatson_peppercorn on 2006/02/05 23:22:15 > > Comment that xenix_eaccess() is probably meant to be implemented by > kern_eaccess(), not kern_access(). Not sure. It was doing VOP_ACCESS() before I changed it to use kern_access(). I'll look at it and see if it should be changed. Hmm, yes it does look like it should use kern_eaccess(). I'll have to make a kern_ version from eaccess() first though. -- John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve" = http://www.FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200602061357.18485.jhb>