Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2011 09:45:20 +0100 From: Urankar Mikael <mikael.urankar@ujf-grenoble.fr> To: Adrian Chadd <adrian.chadd@gmail.com> Cc: FreeBSD Net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>, freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Subject: Re: please (re) test if_ath in -HEAD Message-ID: <20110305084520.GB2833@iut-mir-o.ujf-grenoble.fr> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTim_mTTLPA6KbT2b7pxm1ZmrS7cq5ew99P3zAFZa@mail.gmail.com> References: <AANLkTim_mTTLPA6KbT2b7pxm1ZmrS7cq5ew99P3zAFZa@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu 03 March 2011 at 02:31:05PM -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote: > Hi all, > > For those of you who are testing out my if_ath changes, I'd really > appreciate it if you'd update to -HEAD and re-test. > > I've done a variety of changes to the radio setup and found/fixed a few bugs > in the TX path. It's quite possible these have introduced regressions. I'd > like to make sure that I haven't broken legacy (11abg) support in > weird/wonderful ways. I'd also like to make sure that I haven't > broken/changed the behaviour or performance of the NICs in any way. > > Please give things a good thrashing and let me know the results. > > I'm still working towards debugging and enabling basic 11n support, but I > need to first make sure that I haven't broken legacy operation in any way. > Are you interested by tests on an old atheros card (Atheros 5212, AR2413 mac 7.9 RF2413 phy 4.5) ?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110305084520.GB2833>