Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 12 Jun 2021 01:54:19 -0700
From:      Kevin Bowling <kevin.bowling@kev009.com>
To:        Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org>
Cc:        Kevin Bowling <kbowling@freebsd.org>, Po-Chuan Hsieh <sunpoet@freebsd.org>, dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org,  ports-committers <ports-committers@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: git: 69c9420a212a - main - news/inn-CURRENT: New port to follow CURRENT snaps
Message-ID:  <CAK7dMtBfmzkkH6%2BH65be_P2g4Lf0YRmEqFjOOWZdVDpJEm5t1A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <YMRuyKDxUlESzror@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <202106120054.15C0stWJ075154@gitrepo.freebsd.org> <CAMHz58Qj0-zMocZw0WFVJzQvfSrfaY=cK%2BUnauiU==4kKE1zMQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAK7dMtA1wH3kAnYsobpZFr0orLYWgsLxDgXL2cHOr9DLxJt1xg@mail.gmail.com> <YMRuyKDxUlESzror@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Jun 12, 2021 at 1:22 AM Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org> wrote:

> On Sat, Jun 12, 2021 at 12:41:14AM -0700, Kevin Bowling wrote:
> > There's no clear guidance on this kind of thing in the docs, if you
> > feel this strongly it would be helpful to document it in the handbook.
>
> If you ever worked with ports, you could have noticed that we follow
> `-devel' convention (we currently have over a hundred such ports) and
> there's not a single example of `-CURRENT' port.
>

There are several prominent -current ports, so are you proposing yet
another level of mental gymnastics to erase information?  Document rules
and reasons instead of haunting mailing lists.


> > If you look at things like X11 libs, ImageMagick and perl modules
> > there is no such information erasure, so, why?
>
> Things like CPAN packages, Python modules, etc. come in large numbers,
> have an established naming convention of their own which is also
> followed by popular GNU/Linux distributions we want to loosely stay
> consistent with, that's why.  But it has nothing to do with how we
> name unstable/development/snapshot versions of ports and packages.
>

So, it=E2=80=99s ok to obey upstream conventions if they come in large numb=
ers..
sounds like a textbook cargo cult used to bludgeon contributors.


> ./danfe
>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAK7dMtBfmzkkH6%2BH65be_P2g4Lf0YRmEqFjOOWZdVDpJEm5t1A>