Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 00:58:31 +0000 From: "adrian (Adrian Chadd)" <phabric-noreply@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: [Differential] [Commented On] D1761: Extend LRO support to accumulate more than 65535 bytes Message-ID: <10b1cf0868c1beba7c140cc495e2bcfa@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <differential-rev-PHID-DREV-wifan4aus5qtbwh2gnxc-req@FreeBSD.org> References: <differential-rev-PHID-DREV-wifan4aus5qtbwh2gnxc-req@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
adrian added a comment. .. and yes, I don't think you should be using the hashtype field to flag LRO information. They're totally separate things. (It's totally feasible that a NIC doing > 64KiB LRO will reassemble frames with correct RSS information and feed it to an RSS kernel, which can then ensure it's running on the correct cpuset with the TCP state and locks.) REVISION DETAIL https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1761 To: hselasky, rmacklem, rrs, glebius, gnn, emaste, imp, adrian, bz, rwatson, lstewart Cc: np, freebsd-net
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?10b1cf0868c1beba7c140cc495e2bcfa>