Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 14:42:37 +0000 From: "TEC Meganet" <tec@mega.net.br> To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD data size tuning Message-ID: <20031121.EbN.16579100@admin.mega.net.br>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
now you're touching the art of speaking and understanding ... certainly also a performance so it fits well here :) if the maker of the software says stay with the old one until the newer one is ready it is for me a very clear statement, special in context with talking about PAE or the writer should learn to write better ... Eric Anderson (anderson@centtech.com) wrote*: > >TEC Meganet wrote: > >>it's here >>http://www.freebsd.org/releases/4.9R/announce.html >> > >It says: >"We encourage all our users to evaluate FreeBSD 5.1 and the upcoming >5.2. Because PAE support has only been a feature in 4.X for a few >months, it has not received wide-spread testing, and our most >conservative users may wish to stay with FreeBSD 4.8 until they choose >to migrate to 5.X." > >Which is a lot different than: > > "The BSd people suggest not using 4.9in production servers." > >>Peter Pentchev (roam@ringlet.net) wrote*: >> >> >>>On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 12:12:03PM +0100, Michael Nottebrock wrote: >>>Content-Description: signed data >>> >>> >>>>On Friday 21 November 2003 10:52, TEC Meganet wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>>The BSd people suggest not using 4.9 >>>>>in production servers. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>They do? >>>> >>>> >>>No. Or at least, I know of no such thing, and it would be interesting >>>to learn where and who and how has anything like that been suggested :) >>> >>> > >Eric > >-- >------------------------------------------------------------------ >Eric Anderson Systems Administrator Centaur Technology >All generalizations are false, including this one. >------------------------------------------------------------------ > > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031121.EbN.16579100>