Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 08:57:57 -0400 (EDT) From: Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu> To: Kris Kirby <kris@catonic.net> Cc: freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Alpha 4.x releases (production quality?) Message-ID: <14829.40410.255103.869589@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0010180235330.20601-100000@spaz.huntsvilleal.com> References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0010180235330.20601-100000@spaz.huntsvilleal.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Kris Kirby writes: > > Would a general concensus of the folks on -alpha agree that FreeBSD 4.x > for the Alpha is stable enough for a production server? If you can actually manage to get it installed, it is just as stable as FreeBSD/i386. Most embarassing problems are in the install/bootstrap area. If you decide to try it, I'd suggest installing 4.0-release and buildworlding your way to -stable. When you do this, copy the original (4.0-release) /boot/loader over what installworld installs. Drew To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?14829.40410.255103.869589>