Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2000 23:36:17 +0200 From: Neil Blakey-Milner <nbm@mithrandr.moria.org> To: Tim O'Neil <bwana@flashcom.net> Cc: freebsd-small@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PicoBSD build request Message-ID: <20000907233617.A46922@mithrandr.moria.org> In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20000907094231.00e09ab0@mail.flashcom.net>; from bwana@flashcom.net on Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 09:56:35AM -0700 References: <4.3.2.7.2.20000907070627.00b18270@mail.flashcom.net> <200009071418.QAA28992@info.iet.unipi.it> <4.3.2.7.2.20000907094231.00e09ab0@mail.flashcom.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu 2000-09-07 (09:56), Tim O'Neil wrote: > >I still think that the gap between ipfw and ipfilter is reducing. > >We have stateful inspection now, and the other features (natd, what > To answer your first question; "motivations", the deal was this: > I have an ISP that is using fishy routers (either dhcp assigned ips, > or something, its been a while) to serve my segment of their network. > I couldn't get ipfw to work at all, it would write a cryptic message > to the syslog, something about the ip subsystem couldn't "write the > packet back." You were doing NAT? Was it natd or the kernel complaining? I suspect natd. It just means the translated packet didn't pass the firewall rules. Neil -- Neil Blakey-Milner Sunesi Clinical Systems nbm@mithrandr.moria.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-small" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000907233617.A46922>