Date: Wed, 8 May 2002 17:00:30 -0400 From: Chip Marshall <chip@chocobo.cx> To: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: The future of perl on FreeBSD Message-ID: <20020508210030.GA53266@chocobo.cx> In-Reply-To: <20020508194258.GA27220@leviathan.inethouston.net> References: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1020507202743.83455K-100000@fledge.watson.org> <20020508075543.A5E5838CC@overcee.wemm.org> <20020508185516.GB53102@beaujolais.extremis.net> <20020508194258.GA27220@leviathan.inethouston.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On May 08, 2002, David W. Chapman Jr. sent me the following: > On Wed, May 08, 2002 at 06:55:16PM +0000, George Cox wrote: > > We have mailwrapper(1). How about perlwrapper(1)?! h0h0h0 > > mailwrapper is because FreeBSD comes with an MTA though. Speaking of which, if we want to rip perl out of the base system, why not rip sendmail out too? Allow it to be an install-time option as to which MTA to use, be it sendmail, postfix, qmail, or whathaveyou. -- Chip Marshall <chip@chocobo.cx> http://www.chocobo.cx/chip/ GCM/CS d+(-) s+:++ a20>? C++ UB++++$ P+++$ L- E--- W++ N@ o K- w O M+ V-- PS+ PE Y+ PGP++ t+@ R@ tv@ b++@ DI++++ D+(-) G++ e>++ h>++ r++ y? [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE82ZHu8vyTVl6qbdQRAtKEAKDUYK3Jvu5nX1ydCpcut1gxWcRUCACfcxhF rdiNFOvIz5ba75DmxVh7v2M= =rwxw -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020508210030.GA53266>