Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 01:45:06 +0400 From: Lev Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org> To: Chris Rees <crees@FreeBSD.org> Cc: FreeBSD <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>, Emanuel Haupt <ehaupt@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: svn - but smaller? Message-ID: <464128886.20130124014506@serebryakov.spb.ru> In-Reply-To: <CADLo838bYFu-ihi9B0OaxG==bVnArqvH6Jxh6xY494WLGEoOYA@mail.gmail.com> References: <20130123144050.GG51786@e-Gitt.NET> <20130123201734.be0f9e715289c29e1b03c393@FreeBSD.org> <CADLo838bYFu-ihi9B0OaxG==bVnArqvH6Jxh6xY494WLGEoOYA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello, Chris. You wrote 24 =FF=ED=E2=E0=F0=FF 2013 =E3., 1:25:44: CR> Great idea; CR> http://www.bayofrum.net/~crees/patches/svn-static.diff I think, adding SERF or NEON (what is smaller) is good idea, or this build will lack http support, and it could be surprise to user, as http access method is well-know and useful in case of corporate firewalls. CR> Lev, do you mind if I commit this? I haven't touched the subversion CR> port, but it'll have you as maintainer :) Ok :) --=20 // Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?464128886.20130124014506>