Date: Mon, 5 May 2003 12:44:14 +0700 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@nsu.ru> To: Peter Wemm <peter@freebsd.org> Cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/amd64/acpica OsdEnvironment.c acpi_machdep.c acpi_wakeup.c src/sys/amd64/amd64 autoconf.c critical.c dump_machdep.c elf_machdep.c exception.s genassym.c identcpu.c initcpu.c legacy.c locore.s machdep.c mem.c nexus.c pmap.c ... Message-ID: <20030505054414.GB13833@regency.nsu.ru> In-Reply-To: <200305010105.h4115Q0s052875@repoman.freebsd.org> References: <200305010105.h4115Q0s052875@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Apr 30, 2003 at 06:05:26PM -0700, Peter Wemm wrote: [ .. some stuff stripped down .. ] > - I have tried to minimize looking at the NetBSD code, except in a couple > of places (eg: to find which register they use to replace the trashed > %rcx register in the syscall instruction). As a result, there is not a > lot of similarity. I did look at NetBSD a few times while debugging to > get some ideas about what I might have done wrong in my first attempt. May I ask what was your intention behind trying to minimize looking at the NetBSD code? By loosing a lot of similarity, won't this lead us to potential problems with incorporating fixes and improvements from NetBSD in the future? We always tried to keep the code in sync with other BSDs, didn't we? ./danfe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030505054414.GB13833>