Date: Sat, 22 May 2010 21:40:29 -0700 From: Doug Hardie <bc979@lafn.org> To: Adam Vande More <amvandemore@gmail.com> Cc: FreeBSD Questions <questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: atapicam issues Message-ID: <3C64CABA-150E-4DEE-AEDD-4CC613E6AED1@lafn.org> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTilk01hdsx7iY3K5PoK9Xxx1A85_Om65WJGOfiz3@mail.gmail.com> References: <6D48A7EF-6412-4084-A334-970D3D50A013@lafn.org> <AANLkTinouqUZsWYbBe57pTCyNNFYhToPborySD7pr_iX@mail.gmail.com> <9EA21187-5E9F-4E86-8B82-53EC73DD8410@lafn.org> <AANLkTilk01hdsx7iY3K5PoK9Xxx1A85_Om65WJGOfiz3@mail.gmail.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On 22 May 2010, at 21:05, Adam Vande More wrote: > On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 11:01 PM, Doug Hardie <bc979@lafn.org> wrote: > > Both machines were installed from the same CD over old Windows systems. They were installed within a few days of each other. loader.conf only has "console=comconsole". Reading through the handbook page above it indicates that atapicam needs to be loaded in /boot/loader.conf. I'll add that to both machines. Makes me wonder why the one worked. kldstat showed it was not loaded. > > Well I assumed the hardware is identical but is it a scsi optical drive in the one worked? Hardware is fairly identical but not completely. Drives are both IDE. There are no SCSI cards on either machine.help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3C64CABA-150E-4DEE-AEDD-4CC613E6AED1>