Date: 04 Jan 2003 18:13:55 -0800 From: swear@attbi.com (Gary W. Swearingen) To: Rahul Siddharthan <rsidd@online.fr> Cc: Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org>, chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bystander shot by a spam filter Message-ID: <bsr8bsny1o.8bs@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <20030104182558.A11809@papagena.rockefeller.edu> References: <20030104182558.A11809@papagena.rockefeller.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Rahul Siddharthan <rsidd@online.fr> writes: > GCC 3.2.1 seems to perform around as well, on my code, as Intel's > compiler. Which is quite remarkable, since Intel's compiler is > tailored for their own chip and written by their in-house experts, > while GCC is cross-platform and written by third parties. February's Linux Journal has a four-page article (which might be online) by four Intel guys about their compiler (said to do C & FORTRAN). It's mostly about the optimization schemes but has other stuff at both ends. -- -- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bsr8bsny1o.8bs>