Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2012 16:36:59 +0100 From: "O. Hartmann" <ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: DragonFly vs FreeBSD scheduler Message-ID: <50953A1B.5050401@zedat.fu-berlin.de> In-Reply-To: <20121103091752.0000797f@unknown> References: <CANuCnH9b20NxDpmzPdE2tdEFCTx7a4u_TvvEJNc0J4yCbDm%2Biw@mail.gmail.com> <20121103091752.0000797f@unknown>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] Am 11/03/12 15:17, schrieb Mark Felder: > On Sat, 3 Nov 2012 21:18:55 +0800 > Alie Tan <alie@affle.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> No offence, just curious about scheduler and its functionality. >> >> What is the different between this two that makes FreeBSD performance far >> behind DragonFly BSD? http://www.dragonflybsd.org/release32/ >> > > I don't have any details but I do know that Dragonfly has been putting a lot of work into their scheduler. Hopefully some of that will trickle back our way. Obviously they made the right decissions, but a single benchmark with a DB server like postgresql doesn't tell the whole story. Let's see what Phoronix will come up with. I'd like to see some more benchmarks of DragonFly 3.2. I doubt that the DragonFly scheduler approaches will go/flow easily into FreeBSD. But I'd like to see it, even dumping ULE for a better approach. [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQlTobAAoJEOgBcD7A/5N8TVAIANpURouGOpwbS+eftmdfwIGd 7bF8MNKPCHDvTb83hXpGZuu/nYx/LC8FWSuNn9OfjqJ9MPgMWK6XBRcw/GnSr5/g arIrPFDdN12W4fCM6y9WtNsfaUOrnFRm3s6783qvPk8+1XpmDNc+306bAQZN70i9 7hxp+y50eRUM3xfSlI8P5aY73qgPo1wThfwOudc5wOO0bLlbCzjEvMvrvbfQaCMT F9w3sCKqqE0JejudSbUBfrpnbJgFoJIq4zTOR3xMUX5U83kn/6Wyb1n2++JFJMYx uP6S6xby+bu6dZDvpv3sEbGXYxNYJxiTc5yz1BhJk76BqGrGkpCKBMoD9JN6h+w= =mYbT -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?50953A1B.5050401>