Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 09:23:21 -0400 (EDT) From: Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu> To: Peter Grehan <grehan@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: freebsd-ppc@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: atomic.h vs atomic.s Message-ID: <15769.41417.992988.967586@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> In-Reply-To: <3D9998BA.6122FC2D@freebsd.org> References: <15768.30116.381592.891890@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <3D9998BA.6122FC2D@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Peter Grehan writes: > > Actually, I think it's a simple problem: the atomic_* routines don't > >disable interrupts, so there's a window between the initial load > >and the reservation. > > I'm completely wrong about this, but until I get work out the bugs > in atomic.h, I've put up a new kernel.nfs built with a brain-dead atomic.h > (also on freebsd.org/~grehan) that will suffice for now. > > Netperf seems to work OK. Let me know if you get any further. > > later, Netperf works for me too. But .. I'm still getting the transient compiler failures when I first start a build. And it locked up solid the first time I started the build.. Scary. Drew To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ppc" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?15769.41417.992988.967586>