Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2002 16:13:03 +0200 From: Wilko Bulte <wkb@freebie.xs4all.nl> To: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: RFC: removing Turbochannel support for 5.0-current? Message-ID: <20020706161303.A77960@freebie.xs4all.nl> In-Reply-To: <20020630124513.C71627@dragon.nuxi.com>; from obrien@FreeBSD.ORG on Sun, Jun 30, 2002 at 12:45:13PM -0700 References: <20020630191443.A36002@freebie.xs4all.nl> <20020630124513.C71627@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Jun 30, 2002 at 12:45:13PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > On Sun, Jun 30, 2002 at 07:14:43PM +0200, Wilko Bulte wrote: > > Given that Turbochannel support and support for the machines that have > > TC buses has been left to rot AND the machines that have TC are > > about as fast as 486s running current: > > > > how about removing TC support from -current and from -current only? > > I've got that commit ready to go... but maybe I should let Drew's reponce > to this time out first. Apart from a diversion in this thread to discuss Multias/NoNames (which have no TC so...) I think the consensus is to axe TC. David, would you do the honors, as you have prepared it already? -- | / o / /_ _ wilko@FreeBSD.org |/|/ / / /( (_) Bulte Arnhem, the Netherlands To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020706161303.A77960>