Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2002 07:50:14 -0600 From: D J Hawkey Jr <hawkeyd@visi.com> To: questions at FreeBSD <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Looking for opinions: popd vs. popper vs. et.al. Message-ID: <20021111075014.A23204@sheol.localdomain>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Anyone fooled around with the various POP daemons in the ports?
I'm looking for the one that:
- is "native" to the BSDs
- supports SSL, and plays well with fetchmail and MS clients
- has the smallest footprint and consumes the least resources
- is suitable for a small, private LAN, but may occasionally
be hit from "the outside"
- is straight-forward enough in configuration
- doesn't have a lot of dependancies
I'm leaning toward popd, but that's just based on the pkg-descr.
Thanks,
Dave
--
______________________ ______________________
\__________________ \ D. J. HAWKEY JR. / __________________/
\________________/\ hawkeyd@visi.com /\________________/
http://www.visi.com/~hawkeyd/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021111075014.A23204>