Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2014 00:53:03 -0800 (PST) From: Anton Shterenlikht <mexas@bris.ac.uk> To: egunther@warwick.net, freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: built xorg-server, what next? Message-ID: <201412010853.sB18r15i018741@mech-as221.men.bris.ac.uk> In-Reply-To: <1417373645.2057.1.camel@warwick.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Subject: Re: built xorg-server, what next? >From: Eric Gunther <egunther@warwick.net> >To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org >Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2014 13:54:05 -0500 > >Hi, > > >Not too confident about this but maybe this is your problem. > Below, Xorg.0.log shows that dri, dri2, >and glx will be loaded. > While it seems from your xorg.conf that you wanted them to not be loaded. > > X.Org Server Extension : 6.0 >[175580.806] (WW) "dri" will not be loaded unless you've specified it to be loaded elsewhere. >[175580.806] (WW) "dri2" will not be loaded unless you've specified it to be loaded elsewhere. >[175580.806] (WW) "glx" will not be loaded unless you've specified it to be loaded elsewhere. >[175580.807] (II) "extmod" will be loaded. This was enabled by default and also specified in the config file. >[175580.807] (II) "dbe" will be loaded. This was enabled by default and also specified in the config file. >[175580.807] (II) "glx" will be loaded even though the default is to disable it. >[175580.807] (II) "record" will be loaded by default. >[175580.807] (II) "dri" will be loaded even though the default is to disable it. >[175580.808] (II) "dri2" will be loaded even though the default is to disable it. > > >Section "Module" > Load "dbe" > Disable "dri" > Disable "dri2" > Disable "glx" > SubSection "extmod" > Option "omit xfree86-dga" > EndSubSection > >Section "ServerFlags" > Option "AIGLX" "false" > Option "NoAccel" "True" > Option "NoDRI" "True" > Option "DRI" "False" > Option "DRI2" "False" >EndSection Yes, I noticed that. However, not sure what else I can do. Seems X thinks these modules really must be loaded. Don't know why. Perhaps these three are required by some othe module? Or perhaps these are really necessary for X to work? >Also, in the xdm log, is the use of the file Xsetup_0 unusual? > >xdm info (pid 843): sourcing /usr/local/lib/X11/xdm/Xsetup_0 No, that is normal. However, on amd64 I see 2 more lines: xdm info (pid 1029): sourcing /usr/local/lib/X11/xdm/Xsetup_0 xdm info (pid 1029): sourcing /usr/local/lib/X11/xdm/GiveConsole xdm info (pid 1038): executing session /usr/local/lib/X11/xdm/Xsession So it seems xdm is stuck on Xsetup_0 and does not get to GiveConsole at all. Xsetup_0 just launches xconsole: % cat /usr/local/lib/X11/xdm/Xsetup_0 #!/bin/sh xconsole -geometry 480x130-0-0 -daemon -notify -verbose -fn fixed -exitOnFail % which does come up fine. Thanks for the hints Anton
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201412010853.sB18r15i018741>