Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 20:25:18 -0400 (EDT) From: Adrian Filipi-Martin <adrian@ubergeeks.com> To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: docs/37470: jail field not documented in procfs(5) Message-ID: <200204260025.g3Q0PID93403@mail.ubergeeks.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Number: 37470 >Category: docs >Synopsis: jail field not documented in procfs(5) >Confidential: no >Severity: non-critical >Priority: low >Responsible: freebsd-doc >State: open >Quarter: >Keywords: >Date-Required: >Class: doc-bug >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Thu Apr 25 17:30:01 PDT 2002 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: Adrian Filipi-Martin >Release: FreeBSD 4.5-STABLE i386 >Organization: >Environment: System: FreeBSD brokenarrow.intranet 4.5-STABLE FreeBSD 4.5-STABLE #4: Wed Apr 24 14:57:09 EDT 2002 root@:/usr/src/sys/compile/LatitudeCPi i386 RELENG_4 from 4/23/02. >Description: The procfs(5) manpage does not mention the last field of the status file, even though it exists and is documented in jail(2) and jail(8). >How-To-Repeat: cat /procfs/1/status >Fix: Apply this patch to the procfs(5) manapge: --- procfs.5.orig Thu Apr 25 19:11:58 2002 +++ procfs.5 Thu Apr 25 19:16:40 2002 @@ -169,6 +169,10 @@ and the list of groups (whose first member is the effective group id) all comma separated. +.It +the hostname of the jail in which the process runs, or +.Dq Li - +to indicate that the process is not running within a jail. .El .El .Pp >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted: To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200204260025.g3Q0PID93403>