Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2005 03:13:43 +0800 From: "Kahlil Erwin S. Talledo" <kstalledo@gmail.com> To: "'Ezequiel O. Block'" <ezequiel.block@eobsistemas.com.ar> Cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: RE: multihomed gateway Message-ID: <4316016c.152acb92.0862.0d7c@mx.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <43160092.1050403@eobsistemas.com.ar>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ezequiel, Why not use pf instead? ;) I find pf more adorable than ipfw in cases such as these ;) though pf is native to openbsd it runs quite well on freebsd... Hope this helps. Regards, -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-isp@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-isp@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Ezequiel O. Block Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2005 3:10 AM Cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: multihomed gateway Boris Samorodov wrote: > On Wed, 31 Aug 2005 15:15:40 -0300 Ezequiel O. Block wrote: > > >>I'm currently running mpd as a PPPoe server, serving 250~ users with >>no problems so far, what I need now is to add another ip pool range >>from another provider, which means I need to handle two default >>gateways, one for each C class network. but it seems that FreeBSD >>cann't have two defaultrouter="" directives in rc.conf ... i have >>googled about it and couldn't find any solution .. anyone here have >>had this issue before? any clue? > > > Maybe ipfw fwd action should fit your needs. > > > WBR thanks for the replay! mmm I forgot to tell that each client pc gets a public ip address, such as 200.43.83.x and the server does proxy arp on them, do you think ipfw would be useful in this case? _______________________________________________ freebsd-isp@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-isp To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-isp-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4316016c.152acb92.0862.0d7c>