Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 09:32:17 +0100 From: Lars Engels <lars.engels@0x20.net> To: heasley <heas@shrubbery.net> Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fbsd11 & sshv1 Message-ID: <20170131083217.GG25286@e-new.0x20.net> In-Reply-To: <20170127173016.GF12175@shrubbery.net> References: <20170127173016.GF12175@shrubbery.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--A3bjmUvO/1DXpqhN Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 05:30:17PM +0000, heasley wrote: > I do appreciate fbsd's and openssh's altruism with the removal of v1 supp= ort. > But, the fact is that there is equipment in the wild that does not support > v2 and never will and otherwise works perfectly fine, yet sshv1 is still a > better choice than telnet. >=20 > So, what is the BCP to support a v1 client for outbound connections on fb= sd > 11? Hopefully one that I do not need to maintain by building a special s= sh > from ports. Is there a pkg that I'm missing? If you can use a GTK application, there's security/putty which supports SSHv1. --A3bjmUvO/1DXpqhN Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQF8BAEBCgBmBQJYkEuRXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ4RjQwMDE3RTRERjUzMTI1N0FGRTUxNDlF NTRDQjM3RDNBMDg5RDZEAAoJEOVMs306CJ1tTgQIAMIStrYSpSDwPIDW2b5YaCQY 5ltbLCcQKXTqvisE57zBwnW+an0KQ9PA5XRrnpHqWaSqZ2pBJiBirEfaOnGzzBZi bhY0qoroI9sVJWBDpTviJ078oRDVbXUDQqlaeD/hdk5EGRiHNH4u4QYzikl7WHp+ 8HeXnETdn1VFiNftPulq7FtORav238mSuPWfoRMnHRtW1pxiA72U5bvKzi94CiHj 57PsnSlTdzEdHfWw8pqyzyCvy5QYETuDvWZA91eMQAb0Ny6Qg06Lfm0D4rEuYIxa Csr5tev7ydzI99mmKIP69pdW1CXg5mbvWVeNlWrPwGJ8GG04olkErKtMoUKKdoE= =P9QZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --A3bjmUvO/1DXpqhN--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20170131083217.GG25286>