Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2003 07:17:02 +0100 From: phk@freebsd.org To: Peter Wemm <peter@freebsd.org> Cc: cvs-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern kern_ntptime.c kern_tc.c Message-ID: <2808.1041833822@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 05 Jan 2003 17:01:08 PST." <200301060101.h06118wq075034@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <200301060101.h06118wq075034@repoman.freebsd.org>, Peter Wemm writes : >peter 2003/01/05 17:01:08 PST > > Modified files: > sys/kern kern_ntptime.c kern_tc.c > Log: > Explicitly have the timecounter init happen after the cpu_initclocks is > called. Otherwise (depending on a non-deterministic sort), the timecounter > code can be initialized before the clock rate has been set (on ia64) and it > assumes hz = 100, rather than the real value of 1024. I'm not sure how much > gets upset by this. Nothing really. Only issue would be very high HZ where you will spend more time fiddling timecounters than you need, but getting better get*time() resolution for the effort. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2808.1041833822>