Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 03 Aug 2004 16:00:59 GMT
From:      Mark <admin@asarian-host.net>
To:        <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Cc:        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: One OR MORE of source and destination addresses?
Message-ID:  <200408031600.I73G0W9L037695@asarian-host.net>
References:  <20040803105731.197c7cd0.wmoran@potentialtech.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bill Moran wrote:

> How about using skipto instead of allow?  Thus, if it passes the
> first one, it can just skipto the next rule to be checked.  i.e.:
> 
> ipfw add 11 skipto 12 tcp from any to me 25 setup limit dst-addr 32
> ipfw add 12 allow tcp from any to me 25 setup limit src-addr 4
> 
> Thus, if rule 11 pases, it skips to rule 12.  If it fails, it should
> reject as always.  The end result is that a packet _must_ pass both
> rules to be allowed.

I spoke too soon. :( It seems this sort of rules evokes a bug:

http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ipfw/2004-April/001084.html

My whole console is flooded with messages like these:

    "ipfw: install_state: entry already present, done"

Is there a known patch?

Thanks,

- Mark



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200408031600.I73G0W9L037695>