Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 00:58:04 +0900 From: Hajimu UMEMOTO <ume@freebsd.org> To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, Bernd Walter <ticso@cicely7.cicely.de>, ticso@cicely.de Subject: Re: strange netstat -ian output Message-ID: <yge8vyfmusz.wl%ume@mahoroba.org> In-Reply-To: <20110120153637.W3489@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> References: <20110119024431.GC39356@cicely7.cicely.de> <ygeaaivmwaf.wl%ume@mahoroba.org> <20110120153637.W3489@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, >>>>> On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 15:38:13 +0000 (UTC) >>>>> "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> said: > Yes, it is the internal scope address representation of the KAME IPv6 > stack. It is hided in the output of 'netstat -rn'. But, it seems not > for `netstat -ani'. There is no reason to not hide it for `netstat > -ani', IMHO. So, I've just committed to hide it: > > http://svn.freebsd.org/viewvc/base?view=revision&revision=217642 bzeeb> Thanks; there's also a PR somewhere about it from today or yesterday. Oops, I didn't notice the PR. Thank you for letting me it. I've just closed it. bzeeb> The real problem of course is that those things are still queried by bzeeb> kvm(3) rather than by a real interface in which case I think the bzeeb> kernel shouldn't export the addresses with the scope embedded. We bzeeb> should make sure that with libnetstat or whatever, this will not come bzeeb> back. Yes, I think so, too. The addresses with the scope embedded is annoyance. Sincerely, -- Hajimu UMEMOTO @ Internet Mutual Aid Society Yokohama, Japan ume@mahoroba.org ume@{,jp.}FreeBSD.org http://www.imasy.org/~ume/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?yge8vyfmusz.wl%ume>