Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 05 Apr 2001 14:40:46 +0800
From:      John Summerfield <summer@os2.ami.com.au>
To:        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Should I switch? [was Re: A novel idea....] 
Message-ID:  <200104050636.f356atI07350@dugite.os2.ami.com.au>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 04 Apr 2001 20:44:39 EST." <20010404204439.A17787@cec.wustl.edu> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

> =

> 7. FreeBSD is developed very rapidly. Especially if you subscribe to
> mailing lists, you can see bugs fixed almost as soon as they are
> mentioned. New features are added more conservatively, however. New
> stuff is tried out in -CURRENT, where the heavy-duty FreeBSD hackers
> make it stable, then merge it into -STABLE. The reason Linux became mor=
e
> popular than FreeBSD is, as I've read: Linux development is
> helter-skelter--anybody can make changes to the system and redistribute=

> them with ease. As a consequence, a wide range of people worked to
> develop the components on your Debian system. This distribution and
> encouragement led to confusion, but also popularity. FreeBSD, on the
> other hand, is maintained by a fixed group of committers. While you can=

> still modify your system, it is more difficult to get random changes
> into the main code tree. The result is a more structured and sane
> development process, with an emphasis on stability rather than untested=

> additions.

While it's true anyone can make changes to Linux and redistribute them wi=
th ease, I =

don't see how it's a point of difference. What prevents me from taking a =
bit of BSD, =

changing it and distributing it how I will?

Actually getting a change into a distribution of Linux requires convincin=
g a =

Responsible Person that it's a good idea, and that Responsible Person is =
going to =

take care either because his job may be on the line if he gets it wrong, =
or it's his =

pet part of the overall Scheme of Things and he really truly cares about =
it.

In that regard, I don't see that FreeBSD is a lot different from a distri=
bution.


Remember too that a good deal of the software on BSD is the same as is on=
 linux.


-- =

Cheers
John Summerfield
http://www2.ami.com.au/ for OS/2 & linux information.
Configuration, networking, combined IBM ftpsites index.

Microsoft's most solid OS: http://www.geocities.com/rcwoolley/

Note: mail delivered to me is deemed to be intended for me, for my dispos=
ition.




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200104050636.f356atI07350>