Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 23:26:08 +0200 From: Philip Paeps <philip@FreeBSD.org> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: Warner Losh <imp@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/acpica acpi_pci.c src/sys/dev/pci pci.c Message-ID: <20040427212608.GB733@loge.home.paeps.cx> In-Reply-To: <20040427200044.GA63899@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <200404260211.i3Q2Bcrt037219@repoman.freebsd.org> <200404270912.48113.jhb@FreeBSD.org> <20040427135817.GD19151@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU> <20040427200044.GA63899@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2004-04-27 13:00:44 (-0700), Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 27, 2004 at 09:58:17AM -0400, Ken Smith wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 27, 2004 at 09:12:47AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> > > Unfortunately, the PR number is wrong (that's some ports PR) and there
> > > are no PR's in the database with an originator that contains 'Remesov'
> > > or the text 'acpi_pci' in the text fields at least none that
> > > query-pr-summary.cgi can find. Ugh, actually, query-pr is just hosed as
> > > it thinks we have no open PRs. *sigh*
> >
> > Oops, I only noticed the 'query-pr' when I first read this and didn't
> > notice the 'query-pr-summary.cgi'. It was through the Web interface you
> > were trying this? I poked at that briefly and noticed that I needed to
> > check the "Look at closed PR's too" box to see the one with Remesov as the
> > originator. Not sure what happened in the query for all open PR's but if
> > it's reproducible can you let me know?
> >
> > [ Sorry for being jumpy, I'm watching for things that might have been
> > broken by the 4.10-RC upgrades... ]
>
> The web interface to GNATS is pretty temperamental - it often plays games
> like this.
Could it be taught to also temperamentally fix the bugs, while it's closing
the reports? :-)
"Thank you for reporting a bug to FreeBSD, our temperamental webbased
interface will be fixing it for you shortly" *grin*
- Philip
--
Philip Paeps Please don't CC me, I am
subscribed to the list.
When properly administered, vacations do not diminish
productivity. For every week you are away and get nothing
done, there is another week when your boss is away and you
get twice as much done.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040427212608.GB733>