Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 17:53:34 +0200 From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RFC: using ceph as a backend for an NFSv4.1 pNFS server Message-ID: <ljlthu$4au$1@ger.gmane.org> In-Reply-To: <507714298.1684844.1398541651089.JavaMail.root@uoguelph.ca> References: <507714298.1684844.1398541651089.JavaMail.root@uoguelph.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On 26/04/2014 21:47, Rick Macklem wrote: > Any other comments w.r.t. this would be appreciated, including > generic stuff like "we couldn't care less about pNFS" or technical > details/opinions. > > Thanks in advance for any feedback, rick > ps: I'm no where near committing to do this at this point and > I do realize that even completing the ceph port to FreeBSD > might be beyond my limited resources. What functionality from ceph would pNFS really need? Would pNFS need to be implemented with a single back-end storage like ceph or could it be modular? (I don't have much experience here but it looks like HDFS is becoming popular for some big-data applications). [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iKYEARECAGYFAlNeeX5fFIAAAAAALgAoaXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3Bl bnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDYxNDE4MkQ3ODMwNDAwMDJFRUIzNDhFNUZE MDhENTA2M0RGRjFEMkMACgkQ/QjVBj3/HSzXFgCbBhafBD7xt+lk9XJKBcTqxNHs X20AnRgTfu75NtSn77JdW6LfPaTIpdkf =Cyor -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ljlthu$4au$1>