Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2022 00:19:53 +0100 From: Hans Petter Selasky <hps@selasky.org> To: Chris <bsd-lists@bsdforge.com>, Michael Gmelin <freebsd@grem.de> Cc: FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, Shawn Webb <shawn.webb@hardenedbsd.org> Subject: Re: Patch for patch, but not foreach :-) Message-ID: <ffa94c39-ea8c-75ab-f15d-228d132cce19@selasky.org> In-Reply-To: <1cbe6ac6-c48b-a59e-dc3d-18cf59ed16aa@selasky.org> References: <CAH7qZfumRNfOanUK8Po5bS3Lz5Njndorj-OQxTMWsWJTDymhdg@mail.gmail.com> <12082107-B6CE-4EB3-935A-812FC1966CFA@grem.de> <36f77d67cb2673caf8ce72ec45ce8881@bsdforge.com> <1cbe6ac6-c48b-a59e-dc3d-18cf59ed16aa@selasky.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On 5/10/21 15:57, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > On 5/7/21 11:58 PM, Chris wrote: >> On 2021-05-07 14:10, Michael Gmelin wrote: >>> What about using "."? Or "/" (which would match the muscle memory of >>> "search" in >>> less/more/vi/some browsers)? >> +1 >> I really like that idea. > > Hi, > > Thank you for all the good feedback! > > Based on the input I've got, the differential revision has now been > updated: > > https://reviews.freebsd.org/D30160 > Still looking for feedback on this? Anyone tried it? --HPShelp
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ffa94c39-ea8c-75ab-f15d-228d132cce19>