Date: Wed, 23 Oct 1996 14:16:51 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Possibility? Message-ID: <199610232116.OAA10473@phaeton.artisoft.com> In-Reply-To: <199610230719.JAA23418@uriah.heep.sax.de> from "J Wunsch" at Oct 23, 96 09:19:42 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > Anyway, the core team is supposed to consider BSD4.4 source bases > > other than FreeBSD and incorporate useful changes without my help. > > The core team is supposed to coordinate the work. Nothing less, but > nothing more. So if, for instance, the BSD 4.4-Lite2 code is not being actively integrated, how can it possibly result in a coordination conflict? I think the core team sets direction and policy, as well as self-sechduling core team members as engineering resources, doesn't it? I mean, otherwise there would be no reason for not integrating patches, even if they were not fully understood by some core team member or other? Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199610232116.OAA10473>