Date: Tue, 19 Mar 96 17:15:17 +0100 From: garyj@frt.dec.com To: hackers%freebsd.org@inet-gw-1.pa.dec.com Cc: isdn%muc.ditec.de@inet-gw-1.pa.dec.com Subject: Re: ISDN: "modem" or board? (Was: Microsoft "Get ISDN"?) Message-ID: <9603191615.AA19570@cssmuc.frt.dec.com> In-Reply-To: Message from Greg Lehey <lehey.pad@sni.de> of Tue, 19 Mar 96 16:22:14 %2B0700.
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
lehey.pad@sni.de writes: > They could well be right. That's one of the reasons why we're waiting > for you to install the stuff :-) I don't think it would be the > boards, though: they're so primitive that I don't think there would be > anything to change. this is probably correct, since we don't use the Teles board in auto mode and do all the LAPD in software. The question is, do the TelCos use Q.931 ? That's what our lap driver uses. Or is it Q.921 ? > My bet is that the CAPI would be different. That > could pose severe problems for the FreeBSD implementation, at least > until we find out what the differences are. > CAPI ? FBSD don't use no steenkin' CAPI ! (the bandits in "The Treasure of the Sierra Madre" never said "steenkin'", BTW) :-) We program the boards ourselves and provide a simple tty interface for AT type commands. --- Gary Jennejohn (work) gjennejohn@frt.dec.com (home) Gary.Jennejohn@munich.netsurf.de (play) gj@freebsd.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9603191615.AA19570>