Date: Wed, 29 Nov 1995 13:44:12 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> To: ahill@interconnect.com.au (Anthony Hill) Cc: chuckr@glue.umd.edu, prefect@prefect.unomaha.edu, questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Compile problems with 2.1 Message-ID: <199511292044.NAA28536@phaeton.artisoft.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSI.3.91.951129172130.12864C-100000@tulpi.interconnect.com.au> from "Anthony Hill" at Nov 29, 95 05:24:54 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > device, and it's NOT an optional device, put it back in. > > I am doing this all the time - It would be great if someone popped a few > extra comments in LINT detailing which devices were optional, and which > were not. (Trial and error can get a bit tedious) It would be greater if the "optional" qualifier was removed from the files.i386 for the thing so that it was never removed, accidently or otherwise. Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199511292044.NAA28536>