Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 00:33:56 +0100 From: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> To: jdow <jdow@earthlink.net> Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: OpenBSD's spamd. Message-ID: <458876E4.2070300@quip.cz> In-Reply-To: <00b801c723be$106ce980$0225a8c0@wednesday> References: <200612191227.kBJCRRLJ054427@lurza.secnetix.de> <4587D1B6.6060500@andric.com><200612191146.45521.joao@matik.com.br> <45882572.7040707@vindaloo.com> <00b801c723be$106ce980$0225a8c0@wednesday>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
jdow wrote:
> Features aside I see a huge problem with something called spamd. That
> is the same name as the daemon mode for SpamAssassin. It's not good
> to have duplicated names that way. It makes life difficult when you
> want to run both tools on the same system.
Yes, it is confusing, but OpenBSD's spamd is in ${PREFIX}/libexec/spamd
and SpamAssasin's is in ${PREFIX}/bin/spamd so it can be installed on
the same system without conflicts.
Miroslav Lachman
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?458876E4.2070300>