Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1999 15:02:34 +0500 From: Konstantin Chuguev <joy@urc.ac.ru> To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: rpc.statd eats 257M on 3.0-CURRENT Message-ID: <3699CC3A.6BFF7CE0@urc.ac.ru>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi.
I'm not sure, is it a bug or a feature?
RR01:~# top
last pid: 7755; load averages: 0.03, 0.01, 0.00 up 4+23:52:40 14:34:55
21 processes: 1 running, 20 sleeping
CPU states: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.0% system, 2.3% interrupt, 97.7% idle
Mem: 3960K Active, 3400K Inact, 4264K Wired, 2156K Cache, 1459K Buf, 468K Free
Swap: 48M Total, 3776K Used, 44M Free, 8% Inuse
PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE TIME WCPU CPU COMMAND
7751 root 2 0 1244K 800K select 0:00 0.55% 0.29% sshd1
....................
147 root 2 0 257M 256K select 0:00 0.00% 0.00% rpc.statd
^^^ !!!
Of cource, I know that while the process don't begin to access its VM pages,
they don't need to be allocated.
But if rpc.statd wants such amount of memory, where is the guarantee it
won't fill it up sometime?
RR01:~# uname -a
FreeBSD RR01.urc.ac.ru 3.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 3.0-CURRENT #0: Wed Jan 6 14:38:26
ES 1999
root@y.urc.ac.ru:/amd/buildserv/usr/build/src-current/sys/compile/RR01 i386
For the present, 3 routers and 1 X-Windows workstation based on 3.0-CURRENT
work fine. But I'm not sure all is OK with rpc.statd (I use NFS on all of
them).
Kernels are comiled Jan 6.
What do kernel gurus think about this?
--
Konstantin V. Chuguev. System administrator of Southern
http://www.urc.ac.ru/~joy/ Ural Regional Center of FREEnet,
mailto:joy@urc.ac.ru Chelyabinsk, Russia.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3699CC3A.6BFF7CE0>