Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 10 Apr 2003 16:48:56 -0500 (CDT)
From:      Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com>
To:        harti@freebsd.org
Cc:        John Polstra <jdp@polstra.com>
Subject:   Re: realtime problem
Message-ID:  <20030410164758.B695@odysseus.silby.com>
In-Reply-To: <20030410181322.W774@beagle.fokus.fraunhofer.de>
References:  <20030409114957.GN83126@cicely9.cicely.de>    <20030410113602.K472@odysseus.silby.com> <20030410181322.W774@beagle.fokus.fraunhofer.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On Thu, 10 Apr 2003, Harti Brandt wrote:

> This is a 3com and has an exphy, which in turn uses ukphy_status.
>
> The timing is the same (960usec), because it never takes the first return.
> Should it?
>
> harti

Yes, it should take the early return I added, which is what I think it did
for my 3Com cards, back when I tested it.  You might want to add some
debug code and poke at it more, because the benefits were huge when I
tried it.

Mike "Silby" Silbersack



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030410164758.B695>