Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 22:05:30 -0700 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: Andrew Reilly <andrew-freebsd@areilly.bpc-users.org> Cc: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>, FreeBSD Stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>, Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: 5 to 6 Message-ID: <453D9F1A.5040803@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20061023060431.GA3186@duncan.reilly.home> References: <17719.43574.819134.370333@roam.psg.com> <20061020005501.R32598@fledge.watson.org> <20061023060431.GA3186@duncan.reilly.home>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Andrew Reilly wrote:
> So: my two cents: it can work, but it's possible for it not to
> work, and care is required.
That's always true, but worth a reminder nonetheless. :)
> [*] The production server is using a software RAID mirror on
> a pair of SATA drives on a low-end Intel P4/ICH6 motherboard,
> using ar(4), configured by atacontrol. Fsck on 6.x can't find
> any superblocks on /usr, but 5.5 is fine.
By chance did you upgrade this fs in place from a 4.x install? In
other words, do you have only UFS1?
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?453D9F1A.5040803>