Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 00:41:45 +0100 From: Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de> To: Roland Smith <rsmith@xs4all.nl> Cc: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: send performance of rl(4) Message-ID: <20081215004145.cbb2c71e.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20081214232501.GA2274@slackbox.xs4all.nl> References: <20081214143905.GA9275@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <20081214154452.O49468@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20081214150455.GA11318@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <20081214163257.X49611@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20081214232501.GA2274@slackbox.xs4all.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 15 Dec 2008 00:25:01 +0100, Roland Smith <rsmith@xs4all.nl> wrote: > Swapping the rl(4) card for a xl(4) card did the trick. I can now > saturate the line in both directions. I think I'm going to scrap the > other rl(4) card in my machine as well and replace it with an fxp(4) card. Yeah... something I did some years ago - and I'm still happy with it. I found that - quite in general - the xl and fxp NICs do have better performance than the rl ones. -- Polytropon >From Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20081215004145.cbb2c71e.freebsd>